Assignment: Individual reportLearning outcomes assessed5.1ii, Analyse the intercultural communication process and identify barriers to communication in international business relations; iii, Use communication and collaboration skills to achieve business objectives. 5.2ii Demonstrate familiarity with the vocabulary and techniques of inter-organisational and international communication. 5.3ii Communication; iii Teamwork; iv Information Technology.TASK: This assignment is an individual report worth 30% of the total module marks.You are required to produce a report critically evaluating the challenges of virtual group working based on your reading of relevant literature and on your experiences of working as a group online.Word limit: 1000 words (excluding References List and Appendices)Your report must be presented in the following format:Assignments must be word-processed in 11 point Arial font and double spacedAll pages must be numberedThe assignment must be presented with an assignment statement of originality that is signed, have a front cover showing the programme title, module number and name, title of the assignment, name of the person submitting the work, student number and submission date, plus the word count.Margins must be as follows: Top: 1 inch, Bottom: 1 inch (2.5 cm), Left: 1.25 inches, Right: 1.25 inches (3.2 cm)Assignments not complying with this format will be returned unmarked.Assignment lengthThe length of an assignment is limited by a set number of words to contribute towards the development of writing skills and to ensure all work is assessed equitably. We therefore require you to complete your assignments within the number of words specified in the assignment brief.You will need to think carefully about how best to explain your case within the permitted number of words, using, for example, an appropriate mix of text, drawings, diagrams and tables, supplemented by information contained in appendices.Please also remember that a report can be enhanced or damaged through layout, for example, placing all tables and drawings in appendices can hamper the flow of Discuss (check midcourse.net for the help you need)ion. Decisions therefore need to be made about the most appropriate place to use tables etc, to support your case.The specified word count refers to the main body of the report and does not include front cover, title page, contents page, reference list or appendices. The word count does include headings, tables and in-text citations, but not equations or diagrams.Appendices themselves will not be marked. However, inappropriate use of appendices will be taken into consideration when awarding the final mark.Words that exceed the maximum allowed will not be marked. If in doubt, you should Discuss (check midcourse.net for the help you need) this with the Module Leader beforeFormat of the reportCover page: Title, your name and ID.Introduction ? to include an overview of the group?s objectives for the project as a wholeMain body ? to focus on an evaluation of group processes i.e. how you worked as a group. Use the following questions to help you:What part or aspect of your team process worked well and less well? Why do you think that was? Team dynamics: What about the team process worked well? For example, how was your team able to profit from the diversity of its members (e.g. in expertise, communication styles, technology use, understanding of different cultural, local, professional, or industry contexts)? What were the particular communication challenges within your team? Did you become a team?Technology use: Which communication technologies did you use and how did they enable your team to work effectively (or not)?Use relevant academic literature to inform your evaluation i.e. what you have learned in lectures, read in the core text, other relevant textbooks and journal articles.Conclusion ? to include recommendations for future improvement of your online group working. Use the following questions to help you:What would you change or do differently in your next virtual team project? Team dynamics: How did or would the team revise the team rules? How did you make decisions? How did you deal with conflict (if any)? What was your role in the team? How satisfied were you with your contribution?Technology use: How would you change the technologies or your use of them in future virtual teamwork?References ? to include all sources you have cited in your report, correctly formatted using the Harvard conventions used in the Business Faculty.Appendices ? must include the following and you should refer to these in your report:Group protocols (rules)Group communication planTask allocation and interim deadlinesCoursework feedback sheet: Assignment ?Individual Report?STUDENT NAME ID NumberCriterion70-100% 60-69% 50-59% 40-49% Resit/fail0-39% Presentation, structure & communicationWork is logically and coherently structured in report format. Required appendices are provided. Writing is clear and articulate.Work is carefully and logically organised in report format. Required appendices are provided. Writing is mostly clear and articulate.A fair attempt to structure the work logically and coherently using report format. Most required appendices are provided. A fair attempt to write clearly and articulately.Shows some attempt to organise in a logical manner. Report format not always followed. Some required appendices provided. Writing not always clear and articulate.Disorganised/incoherent. Report format not used correctly. Required appendices missing. Writing is confused in several places.Content and rangeDemonstrates comprehensive and detailed knowledge of relevant topics. Main issues are identified and researched.Demonstrates a reasonable knowledge of relevant topics and an awareness of relevant ideas and concepts.Has given a factual knowledge base and uses appropriate terminology. Some issues/concepts not fully explored.Evidence of limited knowledge of topic. Some use of appropriate terminology.Lacks evidence of research and/or knowledge of relevant topics. Misuses terminology.AnalysisMaterial is broken down into component parts clearly and logically. Information is categorised and prioritised systematically. Inter-relationships are clearly shown and implications fully explored.Analyses a relevant range of information. Interprets, categorises, prioritises and compares information systematically.Analyses a limited range of information. Work is sometimes descriptive with little categorisation or comparison.Attempts to analyse information, but work is mostly descriptive with little explanation, comparison or categorisation.Fails to analyse information.EvaluationEvaluates key activities, milestones and/or contingencies including allocation and performance of roles. Relevant evidence is analysed and critically reviewed to support conclusions.Evaluates key activities, milestones and contingencies including allocation and performance of roles. Draws logical conclusions.Evaluates a limited range of information. Conclusions are largely substantiated and accurate.Limited and only partially accurate evaluation of information.Fails to evaluate, or evaluations are unsubstantiated.ReferencingEvidence is well substantiated through appropriate referencing.Sources of information are appropriately referenced.Some referencing errors in terms of technique.Referencing is very weak with serious omissions.Fails to reference..
INQUIRE / ASK any Question from OUR CUSTOMER SUPPORT online NOW via the CHAT>